World Food Security 
 
Home | About Us | Products | What's New | Contact Us  
Perhaps the most significant...

  • There seemed to be
  • But it is difficult
  • They wanted international

  • Perhaps the most significant development that occurred since the World Employment Conference was the increasing stress laid on the need for parallel changes, in favour of poorer people but also poorer countries, and the relation between the two in the world economic order.


    This was apparent in the conclusions adopted by the conference of ministers of labour of non-aligned and other developing countries in Tunis, Tunisia in April 1978. The conference, while stating as a first objective in a programme of co-operation among developing countries the need 'to accelerate the formulation and implementation of policies for full, productive and remunerative employment in the interest of better satisfaction of national basic needs', emphasized that employment and basic-needs policies, among various objectives of development, would be facilitated by the fundamental changes that were urgently needed in the international economic order to create favourable conditions for rapid economic growth of developing nations.


    In 1977, the secretary-general of UNCTAD stressed the link between international and domestic reforms when he said: A new international economic order can have little meaning if it is not matched by, and does not promote, a new order within the societies of developing countries through new strategies, new styles of development that pay attention to social problems and equitable distribution of the benefits of growth, and which make a frontal attack on mass poverty and unemployment. (UNCTAD, 1977). A similar preoccupation was reflected in the development charter adopted by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) in May 1978. The charter endorsed the need for a new economic order in the interests of the people of both developing and developed countries in order, in particular, to check those trends that had led to a continuing impoverishment of developing countries. It also stressed that the creation of 'fair shares between nations' was 'the achievement of fair shares within nations, so that the mass of the people benefited from economic and social development' (ICFTU, 1978).


    Nevertheless, the growing opposition to the basic-needs approach was testimony to the fact that even with sound economic arguments, and the best of intentions, the views and aspirations of developing countries needed to be fully taking into consideration when launching any new initiative. The basic needs concept continues today under a number of names and guises, including 'participation strategies', 'employment-oriented strategies' and a 'people-oriented strategy for development'. Its legacy can be found in the 'human development' concept postulated in the UNDP annual Human Development Reports that began in 1990 and have continued to this day.


    Its legacy can also be seen in the resurgence of the fight against poverty, without the economic framework, however, that the basic needs concept provided, and in the continuing work on income distribution and the quest for food security. And it was not until the 1990s that it was fully recognized that:
    Today, understanding the labour market is as important for addressing the food security problems of the rural and urban poor in developing countries as understanding the food market. It is now widely accepted that food security is at least as much a matter of poverty - limited access to food - as it is a matter of supply - limited availability of food. (Dreze and Sen, 1989; von Braun, 1995)


    The continuation of this article read on site jac.aopsys.com - World Food Security


    Copyright © 2009